Unfortunately, this all changed when for some reason I glanced at the Council Agenda for June 28.

I was curious after seeing our Mayor pop up on various TV shows pushing the 'give up your holiday home to folks unable to find a rental home' idea and thinking there may be a report to council given he was pushing the notion he would consider 'regulating' this idea.

There was no such report. However I was absolutely stunned by another from the Mayor. A report he has put up with regard to recruiting the new General Manager for the council.

Now I am happy to be corrected but did the Mayor not get elected on a platform of Transparency and Openness! Well. I am sorry to say but his proposal to select a new General Manager is flawed, dangerous and arrogant. The report to the council regarding his proposed method of appointing a new General Manager must be voted down.

The appointment of the General Manager for the next five years is one of the most important decisions the current council will make. It requires all councillors to be involved in the entire process from start to finish, not a hand-picked group of the Mayor's allies.

The Mayor, is proposing, 'Selection Panel' of four to do the first round of interviews for the position. Himself and three other councillors with each of them having barely six months experience in local government to undertake first round interviews.

With the greatest respect, how well is the chosen four versed in the functions of local government? I would be pleasantly surprised if they had a sound understanding of finance, planning, environmental and infrastructure issues after six moths of service.

These are the very disciplines a future General Manager must be interviewed on in this process. This lack of experience with the chosen four could lead to the best candidate being rejected because the of the lack of experience of the proposed selection committee.

Why is Councillor Mayne not included? Does he not have experience in Human Resources? Councillor Pollock would have been through this process multiple times and I am sure the other excluded councillors could bring something to the process from the start, after all they were elected to do such things.

Is this happening because of pre-conceived ideas, maybe outside influences or is it more just a concentration of power into a smaller group of hands? I don't know but either way it is not good democracy and should not be allowed to happen in this way.

In 2008 when we employed a new General Manager the council was made of a group of nine experienced councillors who all bought legitimate input to the process.

Every councillor should vote down this report and demand to be involved in the entire process. We elected nine of you to do a job and you all have a responsibility to be involved from the very start in this process.

The Mayor should withdraw this report because whilst it may be permitted, it shows a complete lack of judgement and sets a dangerous precedent. The appointment of a General Manager needs and deserves every one of the elected councillors involved from the outset.

In terms of time it is not long ago that Australians would have been adamant that telephones would never be possible, aeroplanes would never fly, landings on the moon and Mars - don't be silly, radio and television - get real.

I could fill 10 pages plus with today's norms that were considered impossible, not that many years ago.

The numbers are declining at a fast pace but there are still Australian's who think reaching net zero greenhouse emissions by 2050 - using renewables - will not be possible.

I say to the doubters, be optimistic, just like it would have been with flying to the moon, aeroplanes and television etc, success will finally come.

Investment dollars will now, of course, be many more than in the past. Presently we have available, and still coming, billions and billions of investment money flooding into saving the world from climate change.

This is coming from large numbers of highly respected worldwide organisations - the money they are, and will be investing, will not be wasted.

The advance of climate change/global warming will be halted, in my opinion, well before 2050.