In any other workplace, taking inappropriate photos of a colleague - male or female - would be cause for dismissal.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
In parliament however, it's cause for "empathy training", sick leave and a shift in roles.
The treatment of women by our federal male parliamentarians - both alleged and disclosed - is a stain on our halls of power.
These are the people we've put our faith in to lead us in the betterment of our country. That we've elected them to these roles is the reason they can't be summarily sacked, but it's also incumbent on us to call them out if they aren't living up to our expectations.
If anyone is to be held to a higher standard than surely it should be those tasked with running the country.
Then again, it shouldn't be "a higher standard". It should be the general rule for the whole community. Just don't do it.
If a woman bends over in your vicinity, don't take a photo of their underwear. If a woman is wearing attractive or skimpy clothing, don't rape them.
This is nothing at all to do with the behaviour of the victims and everything to do with the behaviour of perpetrators, invariably men.
That our federal politicians are being encouraged to take up workplace training on empathy and anti-harassment is a positive step - some may say a token gesture, but it's a step nonetheless.
Australia has generations of masculine, macho, 'larrikin', Ocker culture to weed out. It will take more than a one-hour HR workshop.
This ought not to sound completely like Liberal Party bashing, as the same should apply across the board. However, there does appear to be specific issues in that party, which has already seen three senior MPs step down and a staffer sacked.
These days, breathtaking parliamentary scandals still dominate the daily news cycle. It's unlikely shuffling the deckchairs will save the bad ship Misogyny.