I thank Stafford Ray for his contribution to the debate on the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Unfortunately, he treads a well-worn path.
Like every other “true believer” who criticises me and Neville Hughes in these pages, his contribution is nothing more than an appeal to the comprehensively discredited “97 per cent consensus” claim.
Neville and I know all about the 97 per cent.
Consensus is a political, not a scientific, concept.
It would be a refreshing change to see someone address the specific points we make.
By the way, if Stafford is worried about what might happen to his waterfront property in the next 200 to 500 years, perhaps he could let me know what elixir he is taking.
I could use a few more years on my allotted span, too.
Peter O’Brien
Catalina
