More questions for the MinisterIn response to Housing Minister David Borger’s letter in last week’s Bay Post. Firstly it is clear he has little sympathy for residents with concerns of devaluation to their property from the proposed developments. Surely then in his eyes it would be a selling point having a block of 10 single bedroom social housing units without provision for parking or waste disposal right next door?
If the Minister is so concerned for the needy in our community (if indeed the developments are for our local people), why then does he want to put them in units that our council has deemed to be inadequate?
Also the Minister states in his letter that none of the proposals are for large families, why not? When we are a family-friendly street (exactly what we are trying to preserve)?
How the Minister can claim that none of the housing projects are high density or built in clusters is inconceivable, when there is only 100m between the Bent St and Guy St proposals. And council has previously denied application for construction of a duplex on the very site of your 10 units. Surely this is a high density cluster?
The claim that residents have been visited by you or your senior executives is a total fabrication. What does it say about the consultation process when the proposed sites were purchased before any notification was given, or submissions taken?
Through the efforts of Bega MP Mr Constance it has come to light that the proposals are in violation of many council regulations. With parking for instance, council require in Bent St, 13 off road car spaces not the two you propose, and 26 for Guy St. Your five there is unacceptable. The units also have access, shadowing, wheelchair access and waste removal issues.
Basically Mr Borger, all the residents ask is that you adhere to our council guidelines as we, the ratepayers, have to.
Jamie Prior, Batemans Bay
Cruise congratulations
Congratulations to John Pugsley and his team at Eurobodalla Coast Tourism for their efforts towards the successful visit by the cruise ship “The World.” They clearly worked hard both preparing for and during the event.
While we benefited as a local business, it was equally a pleasure to see how much the ship’s passengers enjoyed the experience and to hear their positive feedback.
Peter Meares, Batemans Bay
Disputing fishy facts
John Perkins (Bay Post/Moruya Examiner 11/12/09) claims there is research showing how recreational fishing is a threat to the marine environment. He then goes on to give four examples. I would like to demonstrate his extreme anti-fishing agenda and why he is so wrong with his examples.
Firstly in the article written for the Sydney Morning Herald, James Woodford, an unquestioning supporter of NSW Marine Parks, quotes Dr Alan Jordan of DECC as saying the effects of over-fishing on urchin numbers and kelp has been studied south of Sydney. Woodford either misreported what Jordan actually said, or Dr Jordan was “sensationalist” with what he said as there is not, and never has been, any published evidence showing the presence of significant urchin barrens, due to the overfishing of snapper or lobster in NSW waters.
Secondly Mr Perkins points to a 2002 paper by Daryl McPhee “Is recreational fishing in Australia ecologically sustainable” to demonstrate that fishing is damaging. Unfortunately he should have asked Dr McPhee what his current thoughts are as this is what he said: “I consider that in the last five years in particular, recreational fisheries management has moved ahead in leaps and bounds. While there will always be challenges, we are getting the fisheries management processes etc in place to deal with them better than we have in the past. I am not an advocate of marine parks for marine parks’ sake and my views on the Batemans Marine Park and the quality of science are akin to that of Professor Kearney’s.”
Thirdly he claims that Dr Brian Pratt, a Canberra fishing tackle store owner, is concerned that a “lot of people are taking up fishing and have become too good at it.” What Dr Pratt failed to discuss in the interview is how recreational fishing in other countries with far greater populations is successfully managed without the influence of excessive “no take” zones pushing anglers into smaller and smaller areas. He also fails to mention that in NSW we import 90 per cent of our fresh seafood from interstate and overseas at a cost of $2.2 billion to the residents of NSW.
Fourthly Mr Perkins, without any studies of any description to back his claims, accuses recreational anglers of introducing caulerpa taxifolia to Durras Lake. If he could see past his extreme anti-fishing bias, then he should consider the more likely scenario of wading and migratory birds spreading this weed to Durras, as they most likely have to other coastal lakes.
Philip Creagh, Narooma
Radio needs to keep up with the times
It was great to see international and interstate visitors arriving in Batemans Bay during the holiday period - and us trying to show a sophisticated and cosmopolitan atmosphere.
Well-heeled travellers came ashore from the cruise ship anchored in the Bay and were greeted by our official welcoming party, who looked resplendent and helpfully extolled our many attractions.
While in the Bay, the travellers may have decided to tune in to our radio station to catch up on local news. But what would they hear? They would have heard our local police warning people to slow down during the wet weather we are experiencing - despite it being a bright sunny day. And only one more sleep till Santa arrives. Good advice and up to date if you go back a few days.
Our visitors must have thought: “Who are these people? Some one should tell them Christmas was run and won five days ago.”
If the radio station has no recent news maybe they would be better advised to say nothing than rebroadcast ancient history.
Peter Middleton, Long Beach